Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Unifying proof goals

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Unifying proof goals


Chronological Thread 
  • From: AUGER Cédric <sedrikov AT gmail.com>
  • To: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Unifying proof goals
  • Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 03:45:23 +0200

Le Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:15:45 -0400,
Jason Gross
<jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
a écrit :

> Hi,
> If I have two proof goals that are identical, is there a way to tell
> Coq "get rid of one of the proof goals because it's the same as this
> one"? Or something (a variant of [abstract], maybe?) that says
> "solve these both using this tactic, but only run the tactic once,
> because it's expensive"?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Jason

I guess it is not what you want, but you still can use
cut/assert/pose/set tactics. You can even use a "refine (let H :
<your proof> := _ in _)." or variants if you want to be at a very low
level.

Of course that needs to identify the goals you will need to unify
before trying to solve them.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page