Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Simplest example of impredicative Prop?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Simplest example of impredicative Prop?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Altenkirch Thorsten <psztxa AT exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>
  • To: "Benjamin C. Pierce" <bcpierce AT cis.upenn.edu>, Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
  • Cc: Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>, "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Simplest example of impredicative Prop?
  • Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:55:05 +0100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-GB
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB

Isn't an impredicative Prop nothing else but a universe which is closed under impredicative Pi-types (I.e. Pi-types whose domain is on the same level as the whole Pi-type)?

One argument against a universe closed under impredicative Pi is that you only have it once, I.e. you cannot have two universes Type(0), Type(1) with Type(0) : Type(1) and both of them closed under impredicative Pi-types.

Thorsten

From: "Benjamin C. Pierce" <bcpierce AT cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:07:01 +0100
To: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
Cc: Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>, "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Simplest example of impredicative Prop?

Very interesting.  Just to check: this is saying that we need a universe *instead of* impredicative Prop for this example?

   - B


On Jul 31, 2012, at 3:16 AM, Arnaud Spiwack wrote:

Mmm, very clever.

My bad then. I'll have to retract my example.

On 30 July 2012 15:40, Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl> wrote:
> surjectivity is equivalent to being epi in the category of setoids

You need at least a universe to prove this statement:
http://www2.math.uu.se/research/pub/Wilander2.pdf

but if you have a universe the statement can be proved.

Bas



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.



  • Re: [Coq-Club] Simplest example of impredicative Prop?, Altenkirch Thorsten, 08/14/2012

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page