coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: like <12like34xiongmao AT 163.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, Pierre Casteran:
Because the semantic of the 'prj' temporal operator in our
logic is really complicated. We just want to embedding the
pure axiomatic system in Coq, not the model system.
If I define derviable in Fixpoint,it will invlove semantic.
Can you give me an example about what kind of
axioms I needed for expressing the
relationship between derivability and the constructors of formulas.
(ps:I also read a lot of papers about logic embedding in theorem prover.
Up to now,all the embedding are in model theory invovled semantics.
None of it like this.)
Thanks for your help, I came to see my problem from your answer.
- [Coq-Club] problem in embedding, like, 08/25/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/28/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, Pierre Casteran, 08/28/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, Pierre Casteran, 08/29/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/30/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, Adam Chlipala, 08/30/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/30/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, Pierre Casteran, 08/29/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/29/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/29/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, Pierre Casteran, 08/28/2012
- [Coq-Club] Re: problem in embedding, like, 08/28/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.