coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre-Marie Pédrot <pierre-marie.pedrot AT inria.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] FYI: A formalization that love does not exist
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:45:15 +0200
Disclaimer: do not feed the troll.
On 26/10/2012 00:25, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
That friend didn't buy it, so I decided to formalize the proof that if
unconditional love only starts after the other person somehow loves you,
then either you love the other person unconditionally from the start
(from the beginning of time, so to speak) or you never will.
Drugs are bad, mkay?
(More seriously, I would like to have any fallacious theorem like Gödel/Descartes ontological existence of God formalized in any trustworthy theorem prover to see which exact definition you need to prove such theorems. Anyway, as « all you need is love », that implies in particular:
Theorem : love -> False.
Thus, « Come back Grothendieck, they've become crazy! »)
Uninformatively yours,
PMP
- [Coq-Club] FYI: A formalization that love does not exist, Jonas Oberhauser, 10/26/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] FYI: A formalization that love does not exist, Kristopher Micinski, 10/26/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] FYI: A formalization that love does not exist, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 10/26/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] FYI: A formalization that love does not exist, Jonas Oberhauser, 10/27/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.