coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>
- To: coq-club Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Cc: jose.grimm AT sophia.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] About proper classes
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:22:40 +0200
- Envelope-from: porton AT yandex.ru
There is an implementation of ZFC set theory in Coq called GAIA.
I have the following thought (either smart or stupid one) for formalizing set
theory in Coq:
In GAIA axioms are defined for type Set.
What if we will exclude all axioms which lead to Russell paradox or similar
paradox and define the remaining axioms for a parametrized type T (where T
may be set or ANY other Coq type)?
Then we would have a more general theory and the theory for type Set as a
specialized case (with additional axioms).
I thought about this, considering how binary relations (Set->Set->Prop) are
related with sets (Set) and whether I should represent a relation as
Set->Set->Prop or as a special case of Set.
This is my (either smart or stupid one) thoughts what a future version of
GAIA (or similar theories) may be. Any comments?
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
- [Coq-Club] About proper classes, Victor Porton, 12/23/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] About proper classes, Victor Porton, 12/23/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.