coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
- To: t x <txrev319 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:07:22 -0400
Does the ltac [let H0' := (eval simpl in H0) in set (H0'' := H0')] do what you want? Alternatively, if you are trying to construct a proof without ltac, [Definition foo := Eval simpl in <_expression_>.]
-Jason
On Aug 18, 2013 9:53 AM, "t x" <txrev319 AT gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks!I'm playing around with pattern matching / trying to construct proofs by functions -- and I find myself constantly wanting to have a "simpl" function to simplify terms.Is there a Coq function which does the same as simpl?I.e. "simpl in H0" vs (set H0 := magic_function H0)
- [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, t x, 08/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, Jason Gross, 08/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, t x, 08/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, Adam Chlipala, 08/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, t x, 08/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] simpl as a function, Jason Gross, 08/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.