coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
- To: t x <txrev319 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Using Program/Refine to allow "_" in a definition
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 01:23:34 -0400
Program Definition a' := Build_Foo 5 _.
Next Obligation.
exact lem__5_lt_10.
Qed.
(* or *)
Definition a'' : Foo.
Proof.
refine (Build_Foo 5 _).
exact lem__5_lt_10.
Defined.
-Jason
On Sunday, September 1, 2013, t x wrote:
Thanks!Is the above possible?Hi,Here is my min fail case.Require Import ZArith Omega. Local Open Scope Z_scope. Record Foo := { n : Z; H : n < 10 }. Lemma lem__5_lt_10: 5 < 10. Proof. omega. Qed. (* this line works *) Definition a := Build_Foo 5 lem__5_lt_10. (* this line does not work *) Definition a' := Build_Foo 5 _. (* Question: is there a way to use Program / refine so that I can write the above? In particular, I want to: * fill in the proof after the "Build_Foo" I do NOT want to: * define a lemma before hand to use. *)
- [Coq-Club] Using Program/Refine to allow "_" in a definition, t x, 09/01/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using Program/Refine to allow "_" in a definition, Jason Gross, 09/01/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using Program/Refine to allow "_" in a definition, t x, 09/01/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using Program/Refine to allow "_" in a definition, Jason Gross, 09/01/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.