coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: t x <txrev319 AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] third for of "binder" in Gallina grammar
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:25:19 -0700
| fun binders => term
| ...
| let ident [binders] [: term] := term in term| ...
| ...
Now, what I don't understand is when *** is ever used.
When I'm using it from "let", the [: term] := term provides the "definition."
When I'm using from "forall", at most I use (x: A) (y: B) ... but no need for ":="
Similarly, when using "binders", I also use (x: A) (y: B) ... but no need for ":="
Similarly, when using "binders", I also use (x: A) (y: B) ... but no need for ":="
Thus, my question: when is the "****" form of binder ever used?
Thanks!
Thanks!
- [Coq-Club] third for of "binder" in Gallina grammar, t x, 10/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] third for of "binder" in Gallina grammar, Cedric Auger, 10/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] third for of "binder" in Gallina grammar, t x, 10/10/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] third for of "binder" in Gallina grammar, Cedric Auger, 10/10/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.