coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Laurent Théry <Laurent.Thery AT inria.fr>
- To: "Soegtrop, Michael" <michael.soegtrop AT intel.com>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:07:17 +0100
On 11/07/2013 02:03 PM, Soegtrop, Michael wrote:
Test2: forall c d:nat, ( forall a b:nat, a = b -> a+a=b+b) -> c = d.
intros c d H.
when I want to leave t
You still can but it is more difficult to build blindly ;-)
assert (G := fun a b H1 => (f_equal S (H a b H1))).
- [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypotheis with universal quantification, michael.soegtrop, 11/07/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypotheis with universal quantification, Laurent Théry, 11/07/2013
- RE: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification, Soegtrop, Michael, 11/07/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification, Laurent Théry, 11/07/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification, Rui Baptista, 11/07/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification, Laurent Théry, 11/07/2013
- RE: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypothesis with universal quantification, Soegtrop, Michael, 11/07/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using apply on a hypotheis with universal quantification, Laurent Théry, 11/07/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.