coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre-Marie Pédrot <pierre-marie.pedrot AT inria.fr>
- To: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>, "coqdev AT inria.fr" <coqdev AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:43:21 +0100
On 15/01/2014 17:16, Jason Gross wrote:
> I would like to revive this thread, now that new-tacticals and
> Paral-ITP have landed in trunk. In particular, I'd like to know if
> any of the new tacticals implement this parallel behavior, and if I
> can expect/ask for there to be a parallel equivalent of "; abstract
> tac" for 8.5. (Apologies if I missed some email explaining that there
> is such a tactic.)
Well, the Paral-ITP has somehow simplified the trickiness of the cases
presented here by providing a generic way to manipulate side-effects,
but the state mechanism is not fine-grained enough to handle this level
of detail.
So in essence, I won't be able to use the slave mechanism to do it, but
yes, I can still rely on forking the process as in my previous plugin...
If you're OK with the price to pay to fork, it should be doable.
PMP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Jason Gross, 01/15/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Multi-core execution?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 01/15/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.