Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Large bodies of knowledge

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Large bodies of knowledge


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Rene Vestergaard <vester AT jaist.ac.jp>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr, cl-isabelle-users AT lists.cam.ac.uk, hol-info AT lists.sourceforge.net
  • Cc: renevestergaard AT acm.org
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Large bodies of knowledge
  • Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:09:55 +0900 (JST)

I will shortly be attempting to reach a, for us, non-standard audience with a
project that includes the verification of the complete reasoning in a
molecular-biology monograph.

The primary sales argument is by proxy: there’s a Curry-Howard component to
the project that allows us to solve an open problem in the application domain.

The primary scientific argument concerns formal reasoning, including the
value of formalising/verifying a large body of knowledge, be it a textbook, a
monograph, a “big” result, or similar.

I have my own personal arguments for why large applications are a good idea:
- tests of and guidance for maturity/naturalness/expressivity of tools and
methodologies,
- development of libraries/momentum/etc.,
- teaching/industrial/etc. purposes,
- retrodiction and, of course,
- assuring large case splits and proof by reflection.

I was hoping people would help me with
1) what big applications have been done? what arguments were used?
2) do the arguments hold up in retrospect?

While 1) can be answered by references, I am particularly hoping that some of
the people behind these projects would attempt to answer 2) as best as
possible.

Cheers,
Rene



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page