Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] working on functions -- how to solve this?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] working on functions -- how to solve this?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeragacan AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] working on functions -- how to solve this?
  • Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:38:34 +0200

Thank you Jason. Using Definition instead of Fixpoint worked. I don't
understand the problem, though. Can anyone explain me what's wrong
with using Fixpoint here?

---
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
http://osa1.net


2014-02-13 1:12 GMT+02:00 Jason Gross
<jasongross9 AT gmail.com>:
> Use [Definition] for [closed] rather than [Fixpoint]. Alternatively, use
> [destruct n'; simpl in *].
>
> -Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan
> <omeragacan AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm stuck with this:
>>
>>
>> H3 : (fix closed (n : nat) (t : tm) {struct n} : Prop :=
>> fvs n t = empty_set id) n' e'
>> ==========================================
>> fvs n' e' = empty_set id
>>
>>
>> Any ideas how to prove this?
>>
>> Thanks ..
>>
>> ---
>> Ömer Sinan Ağacan
>> http://osa1.net
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page