coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product."
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:31:04 -0500
Does replacing [forall b : A, r (a*b) (P b) _] with [(fun x => forall b : A, r (a*b) (P b) (x b)) _] work (possibly with some additional type annotations)?
-Jason
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Anders Lundstedt <anders AT anderslundstedt.se> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Arnaud Spiwack
<aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
> ... Except moving to the development
> version of Coq: the refine tactic has been completely reimplemented andIs it possible to just add the reimplented refine tactic as a custom
> accepts holes anywhere.
tactic, without too much fuss?
- [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Anders Lundstedt, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Arnaud Spiwack, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Anders Lundstedt, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Jason Gross, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Anders Lundstedt, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Arnaud Spiwack, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Jason Gross, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Anders Lundstedt, 02/16/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] "Error: refine: proof term contains metas in a product.", Arnaud Spiwack, 02/16/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.