Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Unintended behavior with (operational) typeclass

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Unintended behavior with (operational) typeclass


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Julien Tesson <julien.tesson AT lacl.fr>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Unintended behavior with (operational) typeclass
  • Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:22:00 +0100
  • Openpgp: id=06A5351D


> So, just to better understand what's in going on there, is it just
> typeclasses that are opaque for the unification during the instance search
> or is it the same for all terms ?
> Is there some documentation on this somewhere ?
One should always read the documentation *before* asking such question,
sorry.
I just notice that the answer is almost in section 19.6.5
(http://coq.inria.fr/refman/Reference-Manual022.html#sec678).
So if I understood right the documentation, The command for making term
transparent or opaque works on any term.

But the default status of a given term is not clear to me. I guess it depends
on some black magic made by some great magician in such a way that most of
the time, we don't have to care about it. I'm I right ?

Cheers,
Julien




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page