coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Chris Dams <chris.dams.nl AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 22:11:45 +0200
Hallo Jason and the rest,
Thank you for your suggestion, Jason. This solves the problem that I posted but it seems these levels also affect the priority that operators have and level 7 does not seem to be a very good idea for my operator. It should, for instance, not have precedence over + or *. So now I decided to not use ~ as an operator but to call it == instead. This seems to work. To me it seems very strange that a rather obscure operator binary concatenation operator defined somewhere in the libraries seems to make it quite unusable for other purposes. Couldn't there be a command to make coq forget about a particular notation definition so that an operator becomes freely usable again?Chris
- [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Chris Dams, 06/07/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Jason Gross, 06/07/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Chris Dams, 06/07/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Jason Gross, 06/08/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Chris Dams, 06/07/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Using ~ in a notation, Jason Gross, 06/07/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.