The Coq mailing list

[Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre AT inria.fr>]

Ah yes, exactly what I meant in my previous message. Then what I need.
I do that.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:06:57PM +0200, Pierre-Marie Pédrot wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 13:39, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> > When I end an assert, the type is put in the hypotheses, but not the
> > proof term. For example, when I write
> >     assert (p : 2 + 2 = 4) by reflexivity.
> > the line
> >     p : 2 + 2 = 4
> > is added in the hypotheses but not the contains of p.
> > 
> > I would like to have the proof term also, i.e.:
> >   p := eq_refl 4 : 2 + 2 = 4
> 
> If you're using 8.5, you can use the refine tactic as follows.
> 
> refine (let p : 2 + 2 = 4 := _ in _).
> 
> With a bit of tactic notations, you should be able to simulate a
> transparent assert. Actually, this has been requested already:
> 
> https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3551

-- 
Daniel de Rauglaudre
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/