coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Frédéric Besson <frederic.besson AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Need help with Finite proof involving existentials
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:29:39 +0200
Hi,
My feeling is that this is not provable.
If you go by induction over Finite0, for the base case, you need to prove:
Finite (A * B)
(fun x : A * B =>
exists b : B, In (A * B) (Empty_set (A * B)) (fst x, b))
This is morally an empty set — but unless you allow functional extensionality
—
I doubt this is provably equal to Empty_set (A * B).
Good luck,
—
Frédéric
> On 27 Jul 2016, at 23:49, John Wiegley
> <johnw AT newartisans.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone help me with the following goal:
>
> A : Type
> B : Type
> f : A -> B -> B
> r : Ensemble (A * B)
> Finite0 : Finite (A * B) r
> ============================
> Finite (A * B) (fun x : A * B => exists b : B, In (A * B) r (fst x, b))
>
> It would seem that "finitude" must carry, since the goal does not add any
> elements, but I am having difficulties with the existential variable. Is
> there any way to proceed?
>
> Thank you,
> --
> John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- [Coq-Club] Need help with Finite proof involving existentials, John Wiegley, 07/27/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Need help with Finite proof involving existentials, Frédéric Besson, 07/28/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Need help with Finite proof involving existentials, Jason Gross, 07/28/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Need help with Finite proof involving existentials, Frédéric Besson, 07/28/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.