coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Kristina Sojakova <sojakova.kristina AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:05:04 -0500
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=sojakova.kristina AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=sojakova.kristina AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-yw0-f169.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:NvMkXBwWP+F+vI/XCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0uIVIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtSArawfwLCG++C4ACpbvsbH6ChDOLV3FDY7yuwu1zQ6B8CEDUCpZNXLVAcdWPp4aVl+4nugOlJUEsutL3fbo3m18CJAUk6nbVk9dazJHdvZiN3y3OSv8bXSZR9JjXyze+BcNhKz+CbLt9IKgI1rYp02yBLKpWVBM7BNwmFhJlWNllD//Mar4J9l+gxfvvsg84hLVqCsLPdwdqBREDlzazN938bsrxSWFQY=
Dear all,
I am an inexperienced user in Coq and unsure about whether what I am trying to do can be even done in it and if so, how. The theory I am looking for is the following:
1) I need an impredicative universe, which, however, is *not* proof-irrelevant. Let's call it Set.
2) I need to be able to form a \Sigma-type of the form \Sigma x : A. f(x) = g(x) : Set. Here A : Set. However, I want the equality type "f(x) = g(x)" to be *proof_irrelevant*.
Now I don't know what kind of equality to use. If I use "eq" from the Coq standard library then this lands "f(x) = g(x)" in Prop, and that is/can be proof-irrelevant, which is good. But of course that doesn't work because the whole \Sigma type now lands in Prop too. If on the other hand I use some other kind of equality, then it will not be proof-irrelevant.
For people who are simultaneously into homotopy type theory, I essentially need a propositional truncation of
"f(x) = g(x)" but I don't know how to make it work in the Coq type theory.
Thanks!
Kristina
- [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop, Kristina Sojakova, 12/13/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop, Gaetan Gilbert, 12/13/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 12/13/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop, Burak Ekici, 12/13/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question about impredicative Set and Prop, Gaetan Gilbert, 12/13/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.