coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
[Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value
Chronological Thread
- From: Igor Jirkov <igorjirkov AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:11:58 +0200
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=igorjirkov AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=igorjirkov AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-wr0-f178.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hello! I have a problem trying to prove a property of form: forall (n:nat) (m:T), n > s m -> f (g n m) = f n. Here f: T -> U , g: nat -> T -> T , s: T -> nat. The problem is that g is defined as a fixpoint with
decreasing n, I presume that it obliges me to use
the proof by induction. However, induction over n is giving me premises I can not satisfy: (n > s m -> f (g n m) = f n) -> (S n > s m -> f (g n m) ). Having (S n > s m) I can not deduce (n > s m). Are there some recipes to cope with that kind of proofs?
** The description below lists a bit more code in case it might help; however, it bases on the CompCert's implementation of PTrees (Patricia Trees) so I can not shape a minimal working example **
The property I want to prove is stated as this:
Fixpoint map_last_index {T} (m:Maps.PTree.t T) route := Theorem spec_r:
map_remove removes an element from a tree by index and
shifts all next elements so that they are stored on an index equal
to their old position minus one, filling the The node in a binary tree is located using binary numbers to
encode the route from the root. They serve as indices. map_last_index computes the last index a tree has a node for.
BR Igor Zhirkov
|
- [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Igor Jirkov, 03/27/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Adam Chlipala, 03/27/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Igor Jirkov, 03/27/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Igor Jirkov, 03/27/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Guillaume Melquiond, 03/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proving complex properties of Fixpoint's for all Ns greater than a value, Adam Chlipala, 03/27/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.