coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Banach-Tarski paradox in Coq (proof completed)
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:49:36 +0200
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 06:05:19PM +0900, 永江哲朗 wrote:
> We talked about your proof at our small coq study group last Saturday.
I am very flattered :-)
> I'd like to read your proof through and understand it.
I am writing a paper. It helps me to understand it better. Hope I can
finish it. I did not decide yet when I publish it, if I do.
> Now I'm reading a book which explains Banach-Tarski paradox.
By Stan Wagon, perhaps? I read a couple of pages of his book, but my
sources are essentially Wikipedia where a sufficiently detailed proof
is described.
--
Daniel de Rauglaudre
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/
- [Coq-Club] Banach-Tarski paradox in Coq (proof completed), Daniel de Rauglaudre, 04/12/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Banach-Tarski paradox in Coq (proof completed), 永江哲朗, 04/17/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Banach-Tarski paradox in Coq (proof completed), Daniel de Rauglaudre, 04/17/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Banach-Tarski paradox in Coq (proof completed), 永江哲朗, 04/17/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.