Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters
  • Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:43:19 +0200

On 15/09/2017 17:57, Soegtrop, Michael wrote:

> Btw.: I still wonder where the scope difference comes from.

I cannot reproduce your issue. I tried with 8.5, 8.6, and 8.7, and they
all agree that all the arguments lie in scope type_scope. This is
consistent with

Arguments sig (A P)%type.
Arguments sig2 (A P Q)%type.

That said, I don't understand why P and Q are forced into type_scope.
This does not make sense to me. They should have been left in
function_scope.

Best regards,

Guillaume



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page