coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Dominique Larchey-Wendling <dominique.larchey-wendling AT loria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:46:32 +0200
- Organization: LORIA
Le 10/10/2018 à 16:43, Chris Dams a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> We all know the 'pattern' tactic but I was looking for something that
> takes multiple terms and does the same but came up empty. The idea is
> that we have, for instance the goal a + b = b + a and then can do
> 'patterns a b' to get the goal (fun a0 b0 : nat => a0 + b0 = b0 + a0) a
> b. Or have I missed something?
pattern a, b ?
D.
- [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?, Chris Dams, 10/10/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 10/10/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?, Chris Dams, 10/10/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?, Laurent Thery, 10/10/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Why doesn't there exist a 'patterns' tactic?, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 10/10/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.