The Coq mailing list

[PLDI Publicity Chair <wjb AT williamjbowman.com>]

Please distribute widely:

# Call for Student Research Competition Submissions

https://pldi22.sigplan.org/track/pldi-2022-SRC

The Student Research Competition (SRC) at PLDI allows students to present 
their research and get feedback from prominent members of the programming 
language research community. It’s an opportunity for students to network, 
practice presentation skills, and showcase their work. PLDI invites students 
(both at the graduate and undergraduate level) to submit their research.

We acknowledge that the past several years have been difficult for conference 
organization. As a community, we have worked together to implement various 
options for remote accessibility. We have found different formats have had 
different positive and negative components. For fully virtual conferences, we 
have missed seeing our friends and colleagues in person; on the other hand, 
for virtual conferences, we have enjoyed seeing more participation globally. 
However, many have found that a hybrid format inhibits engagement from all 
participants (remote and in-person). The Student Research Competition (SRC) 
at PLDI 2022 aims to incorporate the positive components (increased 
accessibility) while mitigating the negative components (limited engagement).

To that end, we are excited to pilot a **two-track PLDI SRC** this year.

# Two-Track SRC Model

This model comprises of two pools of submissions: (1) students who present 
their work primarily in-person, and (2) students who present their work 
primarily virtually. To aid with planning, students should select one of the 
tracks at submission time; however, due to the volatility of public health 
guidelines/restrictions, this year, students will be able to change their 
track after the submission.

Our hope is that the virtual track will allow more students to participate, 
regardless of travel restrictions or monetary constraints. However, we will 
note that virtual participants may have limited access to the rest of the 
conference depending on how the different programs are offered (e.g., if they 
are streamed or not). Thus, in-person attendees will likely be able to engage 
with the wider conference, and attendees, more fully.

*Note that the selection criterion of the Student Research Competition is not 
dependent on the mode of presentation. All students will be evaluated 
according to the same criteria.***

# Submission

The main body of the submission is a title and extended abstract consisting 
of the following:

**Problem and Motivation:** Clearly state the problem being addressed and 
explain the reasons for seeking a solution to this problem.

**Background and Related Work:** Describe the specialized (but pertinent) 
background necessary to appreciate the work in the context of PLDI areas of 
interest. Include references to the literature where appropriate, and briefly 
explain where your work departs from that done by others.

**Approach and Uniqueness:** Describe your approach in addressing the problem 
and clearly state how your approach is novel.

**Results and Contributions: Clearly show how the results of your work 
contribute to programming language design and implementation in particular 
and to computer science in general;** explain the significance of those 
results.

The final submission must also include the student author’s name, email 
address, institutional affiliation, research advisor’s name(s), ACM student 
member number, category (undergraduate or graduate), and mode of presentation 
(in-person or virtual). We recommend including all this information in the 
standard author contact information region.

Submissions must be original research that is not already published at PLDI 
or another conference or journal. One of the goals of the SRC is to give 
students feedback on ongoing, unpublished work. Furthermore, the abstract 
must be authored solely by the student. If the work is collaborative with 
others and/or part of a larger group project, the abstract should make clear 
what the student’s role was and should focus on that portion of the work.

The extended abstract must not exceed 1000 words and must not be longer than 
2 pages. Reference lists do not count towards these limits.

Please use the ACM Conference Proceedings Template found here 
https://www.overleaf.com/read/yggzbgjwjntv with line numbers turned on.

When you’re ready, submit your extended abstract at the submission site: 
https://pldi22src.hotcrp.com.

Should you have any questions on if your work is a good fit for the SRC 
track, please reach out to the SRC Co-Chairs.

# Presentation and Attendance

Students accepted to the SRC based on their extended abstracts will proceed 
to the Poster (pre-Finale) Round. For the Poster Round, students must submit:

- a research poster to present at PLDI,
- a 5-minutes pre-recorded talk

In the two-track SRC model, the in-person track will be formatted as a 
traditional SRC: there will be an in-person poster session for three hours, 
in which PLDI attendees and in-person judges can walk around and interact 
with the students. The virtual track will be held in a virtual space that 
will be available to all PLDI attendees. In addition, we will have a pool of 
virtual judges that will walk around and interact with the virtual students. 
For some cross-over, we will organize for a TV in the in-person session, 
which will rotate through the virtual posters.

The top three undergraduate participants and the top three graduate 
participants (selected across both the virtual and in-person tracks) will 
proceed to the Final Presentation Round. The final round of SRC will be 
conducted in a conference room where in-person finalists will first present 
(streamed over Zoom), and virtual finalists will present via Zoom. Both the 
virtual and in-person judges/attendees will get a chance to ask questions 
during the Q&A session after each talk.

# Participation

The Student Research Competition (SRC) at PLDI has always strived to improve 
engagement and accessibility to students around the world. To this aim, we 
will provide the opportunity for a round of asynchronous peer-review 
discussions amongst the SRC participants. The peer-review process is an 
opportunity for the SRC speakers to share their feedback, ask questions to 
their fellow peers, and help them make improvements for the poster and 
presentation round. This is also an opportunity for in-person and virtual 
speakers to engage prior to the SRC poster round.

We hope to utilize our experiences over the last two years to enable 
sufficient engagement in both tracks. We will work to provide tooling 
support, organization, and publicity to ensure all participants have a 
positive experience.

Good luck, and we hope to see you in June!