Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Benjamin Werner <>
- To: <> <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: ssrnat & omega
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:22:39 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer:sender; b=c2njIpLyiuREmbVHlzD0XfX2fJdSQPMqmmo3Nmuv0tl4CVFkO0bXKFge3ih4mMzVwY b2plgNZFMJ1GYs43N0t4FJPiXIxd5s6gbBgAmTwRFBSuRaFGcYstG5nYu86ucxVEepjc 0VqDBtEtEwvFjGAeWjZ7qiE8+QT2MfIAhXuto=
Hello Keiko,
From what i know:
- for now, omega is not really compatible with ssrnat. We can
hope for a streamlined version of omega which would, but
not immediately.
- One can write a small Ltac script to "translate" goals
from ssrnat to regular nat (replacing the operations, the boolean
operators, the equality and`inequality operators by their
respective counterparts.
I did write such a script quickly. It was a little slow but
could be useful. I'll try to find it in my files.
best,
Benjamin
Le 8 déc. 08 à 13:09, <> < > a écrit :
Hello,
If I decided to use ssrnat, then I have to give up the omega tactic?
Best regards,
Keiko
- ssrnat & omega, keiko, 12/08/2008
- Re: ssrnat & omega, Benjamin Werner, 12/08/2008
- Re: ssrnat & omega, Benjamin Werner, 12/08/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: ssrnat & omega, keiko, 12/08/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.