Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Keiko Nakata <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: selectors and coinduction
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:20:30 +0900 (JST)
Follow-up:
I noticed that the problem only appears with Guarded, but I can Qed
the proof without problems; so the reason is probably Guarded examines
unreduced terms, whereas Qed examines reduced terms.
Best,
Keiko
From: <>
Subject: selectors and coinduction
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:45:35 +0100 (CET)
> Hello.
>
> Could first and last tactical unfortunately interact with proof by
> coinduction?
>
> I have been correcting my proof to get rid of unguarded recursive calls
> and suspect a tactic;
> have [h | h] := "something..."; last first
> of making the unguarded call.
>
> kind regards,
> Keiko
- selectors and coinduction, keiko, 02/18/2009
- Re: selectors and coinduction, Keiko Nakata, 02/20/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.