Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - Re: selectors and coinduction

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

Re: selectors and coinduction


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Keiko Nakata <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: selectors and coinduction
  • Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:20:30 +0900 (JST)

Follow-up:

I noticed that the problem only appears with Guarded, but I can Qed
the proof without problems; so the reason is probably Guarded examines
unreduced terms, whereas Qed examines reduced terms.

Best,
Keiko

From: <>
Subject: selectors and coinduction
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:45:35 +0100 (CET)

> Hello.
>
> Could first and last tactical unfortunately interact with proof by
> coinduction?
>
> I have been correcting my proof to get rid of unguarded recursive calls
> and suspect a tactic;
> have [h | h] := "something..."; last first
> of making the unguarded call.
>
> kind regards,
> Keiko



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page