Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From:
- To: Laurent Théry <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [additive of lin]
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 09:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
Thanks. One more question.
Is there some hidden lemma that says
forall (R : ringType) (A : lalgType R) (k : R) (x : A),
k *: x = k%:A * x.
somewhere that I just cannot find?
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Laurent Théry wrote:
On 05/09/2011 01:53 PM, wrote:
If f : 'End(L), then (fun_of_lapp f) is linear and hence addtitive, so I would have expected [additive of f] to type check; however there appears to be no canonical additive structure for 'End(L). Is this the case?
I'm trying to map a linear transformation over a polynomial, so f isn't an rmorphism (it is only an rmorphism on a subalgebra of L), but it ought to be additive.
Overlook, corrected in the new commit.
--
Laurent
--
Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
- [additive of lin], roconnor, 05/09/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], Laurent Théry, 05/09/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], roconnor, 05/09/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], Laurent Théry, 05/09/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], Laurent Théry, 05/09/2011
- RE: [additive of lin], Georges Gonthier, 05/09/2011
- full subalgebra., roconnor, 05/11/2011
- Re: full subalgebra., Laurent Théry, 05/11/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], roconnor, 05/09/2011
- Re: [additive of lin], Laurent Théry, 05/09/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.