Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - RE: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

RE: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Georges Gonthier <>
  • To: "" <>, ssreflect <>
  • Subject: RE: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:33:49 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US

rewrite -big_filter filter_index_enum will do the trick.
(Yes, you sometimes need to use rewrite rules in the converse direction...).

Cheers,
Georges

-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 15 June 2011 11:13
To: ssreflect
Subject: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences

I have a big op on a set similar to:

\prod_(i \in s) ('X - (s a)%:P)

s is some subset of an automorphism group.

I want to convert this into

\prod_(i <- enum s) ('X - (s a)%:P)

in order to apply my lemma that such a product would be a separable (aka
square free) polynomial (since (enum s) is uniq).

However, I can't find any lemma to do such a conversion. big_uniq comes
close, but I can't get it to work.

--
Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page