Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Georges Gonthier <>
- To: "" <>, ssreflect <>
- Subject: RE: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:33:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
rewrite -big_filter filter_index_enum will do the trick.
(Yes, you sometimes need to use rewrite rules in the converse direction...).
Cheers,
Georges
-----Original Message-----
From: []
Sent: 15 June 2011 11:13
To: ssreflect
Subject: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences
I have a big op on a set similar to:
\prod_(i \in s) ('X - (s a)%:P)
s is some subset of an automorphism group.
I want to convert this into
\prod_(i <- enum s) ('X - (s a)%:P)
in order to apply my lemma that such a product would be a separable (aka
square free) polynomial (since (enum s) is uniq).
However, I can't find any lemma to do such a conversion. big_uniq comes
close, but I can't get it to work.
--
Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
- switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences, roconnor, 06/15/2011
- RE: switching between big ops on sets and big ops on sequences, Georges Gonthier, 06/15/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.