Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Georges Gonthier <>
- To: Frédéric Chyzak <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: RE: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...)
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:01:24 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
What I could not understand was the idiom 'Eval hnf in ...'. I first
overlooked that hnf was Coq's and not an ssreflect object. I think I now
understand a bit.
I misread your question too -- I understood you were using the Eval hnf
vernacular command to expand the definition. I often put Eval hnf on
structure instances because Coq would otherwise perform dynamically a head
normal form reduction every time it uses the instance.
You missed my point: I looked into the code only to try to make sense of
the documentation I could not understand. (And I overlooked the second
header.)
Well, qualifiers is a rather recent (2012!) addition to the library, so we
have relatively limited experience on its use (indeed, I have yet to retrofit
them in the group library). If you have suggestions concerning its
documentation I'd be happy to incorporate them.
Georges
- consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Frédéric Chyzak, 03/28/2012
- RE: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Georges Gonthier, 03/28/2012
- Re: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Frédéric Chyzak, 03/28/2012
- RE: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Georges Gonthier, 03/28/2012
- Re: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Frédéric Chyzak, 03/28/2012
- RE: consistency of notations (+ type of Qualifier ...), Georges Gonthier, 03/28/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.