Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Maxime Dénès <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:56:54 +0100
Indeed, declaring any PER as an instance of RewriteRelation solves the problem (it's done only for Equivalence in RelationClasses).
I wonder why Coq's rewrite accepts this without the instance declaration then, but I'm fine with this.
Thank you Enrico!
Maxime.
On 26/11/2012 13:47, Enrico Tassi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:30:51PM +0100, Maxime Dénès wrote:
Hi Enrico!I guess I wanted to say Classes.RelationClasses.RewriteRelation
Thanks for your lightning-fast answer.
The constant Class_setoid.Classes.RelationClasses.RewriteRelation does
What is still surprising is that when the relation is declared as anHum, can you check that PER is a RewriteRelation?
Equivalence instead of a PER, this test seems to succeed.
What Rewrite.is_applied_rewrite_relation does is calling the
type classes resolution mecanism.
Ciao
- Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Maxime Dénès, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Maxime Dénès, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Maxime Dénès, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Maxime Dénès, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Maxime Dénès, 11/26/2012
- Re: Ssr rewrite and partial equivalence relations, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.