Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Beta Ziliani <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: rewrite-by
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:11:55 +0200
Hi,
First, note that ssrnat's < is not compatible with omega. Also, 3 < 5
can be solved by simplification. Finally, I suppose you meant "rewrite
H by omega", since H1 and H2 doesn't exist in your example.
That said, you can use
rewrite H ; last by <tactic>
to solve the second sub-goal with the hypothesis for H.
Hope it helps,
Beta
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:58 AM, t x <> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have something like
>
>
> H: forall a b, (3 < 5) -> a + 3 = 2 * b
> ==============================
> .... a + 3 ...
>
>
> In non-ssreflect Coq, I can do something like:
>
> rewrite H1 in H2 by omega, where "omega" is used to solve (3 < 5).
>
>
> Ssreflect, however, takes over the meaning of "by."
>
>
> Now, is there some way in ssreflect for me to say:
>
> rewrite H in the goal, try to solve required premises using Tactic, and
> have the rewrite fail if the premises can't be solved with Tactic.
>
> Thanks!
- rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Beta Ziliani, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Beta Ziliani, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Pierre-Yves Strub, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Pierre-Yves Strub, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Anders, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Pierre-Yves Strub, 09/03/2013
- RE: rewrite-by, Georges Gonthier, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Pierre-Yves Strub, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, t x, 09/03/2013
- Re: rewrite-by, Beta Ziliani, 09/03/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.