Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - RE: [ssreflect] Question of style

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

RE: [ssreflect] Question of style


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Georges Gonthier <>
  • To: bertot <>, ssreflect <>
  • Subject: RE: [ssreflect] Question of style
  • Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:47:51 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US

No, that equation is not really missing: it is covered by a more general
principal, namely the linearity of composition in its first argument.
Lemmas linearN (as well as raddfN, and even rmorphN if the polynomials are
over a comRingType) will apply directly, in either direction.
The linearity is documented in the poly.v file header:
p \Po q == polynomial composition; because this is naturally a
a linear morphism in the first argument, this
notation is transposed (q comes before p for redex
selection, etc).
-- Georges

-----Original Message-----
From: bertot []
Sent: 05 November 2013 14:12
To: ssreflect
Subject: [ssreflect] Question of style

Hello,

I am using poly.v and I need to reduce

- 'X \Po p

into -p

It seems that there is a theorem missing, with name comp_poly_opp and
statement

-p \Po q = -(p \Po q)

or something semantically equivalent. Do you agree?

Yves



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page