Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Georges Gonthier <>
- To: bertot <>, ssreflect <>
- Subject: RE: [ssreflect] Question of style
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:47:51 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
No, that equation is not really missing: it is covered by a more general
principal, namely the linearity of composition in its first argument.
Lemmas linearN (as well as raddfN, and even rmorphN if the polynomials are
over a comRingType) will apply directly, in either direction.
The linearity is documented in the poly.v file header:
p \Po q == polynomial composition; because this is naturally a
a linear morphism in the first argument, this
notation is transposed (q comes before p for redex
selection, etc).
-- Georges
-----Original Message-----
From: bertot []
Sent: 05 November 2013 14:12
To: ssreflect
Subject: [ssreflect] Question of style
Hello,
I am using poly.v and I need to reduce
- 'X \Po p
into -p
It seems that there is a theorem missing, with name comp_poly_opp and
statement
-p \Po q = -(p \Po q)
or something semantically equivalent. Do you agree?
Yves
- [ssreflect] Question of style, bertot, 11/05/2013
- Re: [ssreflect] Question of style, Laurent Théry, 11/05/2013
- RE: [ssreflect] Question of style, Georges Gonthier, 11/05/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.