Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Beta Ziliani <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 22:28:31 +0200
Hi list,
I have a (probably stupid) question regarding ssr tactics. Say that I
have the following simple goal:
(P -> Q) -> R
and I'd like to get Q with a proof of P. If I have a proof of P,
say x, this is simple:
move/(_ x).
Now, if I don't have the proof of P beforehand, I'd like to do something like
move/(_ _).
and have P as a subgoal. This doesn't work (more precisely, it does
nothing). Is there a simple way of getting a subgoal P and a goal Q
-> R? I want to avoid having to write what P is, of course, otherwise
it'd be easy.
Thanks in advance,
Beta
- [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Beta Ziliani, 04/02/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Enrico Tassi, 04/02/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Pierre-Yves Strub, 04/03/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Enrico Tassi, 04/03/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Pierre-Yves Strub, 04/03/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Georges Gonthier, 04/02/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Enrico Tassi, 04/03/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns, Enrico Tassi, 04/02/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.