Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

[ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Beta Ziliani <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [ssreflect] Specializing assumptions with unknowns
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 22:28:31 +0200

Hi list,

I have a (probably stupid) question regarding ssr tactics. Say that I
have the following simple goal:

(P -> Q) -> R

and I'd like to get Q with a proof of P. If I have a proof of P,
say x, this is simple:

move/(_ x).

Now, if I don't have the proof of P beforehand, I'd like to do something like

move/(_ _).

and have P as a subgoal. This doesn't work (more precisely, it does
nothing). Is there a simple way of getting a subgoal P and a goal Q
-> R? I want to avoid having to write what P is, of course, otherwise
it'd be easy.

Thanks in advance,
Beta



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page