Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jason Gross <>
- To: Enrico Tassi <>
- Cc: ssreflect <>
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:27:36 +0100
Thanks.
Georges has told me that another way to do this is case/(@id bool), which I think is what I'll stick with for now.
-Jason
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Enrico Tassi <> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:01:02PM +0100, Jason Gross wrote:What goes wrong in your code is not the "dependent type" but the fact
> Hi,
>
> Is there a variant of case/boolP that does not error on the following?
>
> Goal forall b : bool, b = b.
> case/boolP.
that b is cleared (and cannot). This works:
move=> b; case/boolP: (b).
Note the extra () around b.
Ciao
--
Enrico Tassi
- [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Jason Gross, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Assia Mahboubi, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Jason Gross, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Enrico Tassi, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Jason Gross, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Enrico Tassi, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Jason Gross, 06/11/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Dependent variant of case/boolP?, Assia Mahboubi, 06/11/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.