Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: <>
- To:
- Subject: [ssreflect] Replacement tactics for "inversion"?
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:04:05 +0200
Hello ssreflect users,
I've found that there are a few cases when I need the propositions that can be
inferred from an inductive construction, as provided by Coq's "inversion"
tactic. What is most unfortunate about this tactics is that it populates the
context, rather than generalizing what it determines.
What is the proper replacement for inversion using the ssreflect methodology?
John
- [ssreflect] Replacement tactics for "inversion"?, johnw, 10/15/2014
- RE: [ssreflect] Replacement tactics for "inversion"?, Georges Gonthier, 10/16/2014
- RE: [ssreflect] Replacement tactics for "inversion"?, Strub, Pierre-Yves, 10/16/2014
- RE: [ssreflect] Replacement tactics for "inversion"?, Georges Gonthier, 10/16/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.