Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Yves Bertot <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [ssreflect] Thoughts on using the tactic ring with the mathematical components
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:25:36 +0100
Hello,
I always had the feeling that using the tactic ring with the mathematical components library is complicated and unpredictable. Lately, I came up with an example formula that contains a large sum with a hundred terms that should cancel out, and using other approaches than ring would impose proof times in the order of 8 minutes. As I discussed the problem around, Maxime Dénès urged me to give one more try to ring. It turned out that finding a solution was not too time-consuming, but still a little brittle.
As a way to improve the situation, I would like to provoke some discussion on the topic. For now, my experiment is visible in a blog page: https://project.inria.fr/coqexchange/cramers-formula-using-ring-with-mathematical-components/ , I know that other experiments have already been performed, links to the developments might be useful. You can either add them yourself or keep me informed.
Yves
- [ssreflect] Thoughts on using the tactic ring with the mathematical components, Yves Bertot, 02/26/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.