Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Assia Mahboubi <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:21:43 +0200
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:9c3Zc6lttDXyl4RH6Jtk+54L0V/pDfJG3DAbv31ZSRFFG/Fw8PrDoB1773XJYVoqNk3I+ursBEDoexq1nqKdirN/AV7NZmjbhFc=
Hello Nada,
by the way, do not hesitate to ask further questions on coq's zulip chat, in the math-comp dedicated stream. It is the best forum for getting help and feedback, and for discussing with other users.
https://coq.zulipchat.com
Best wishes,
assia
Le 06/05/2021 à 01:31, Nada Amin a écrit :
Hi,
I am new to SSReflect. Sorry for the beginner question, I couldn't find a prior answer.
I am using the reglang library:
https://github.com/coq-community/reglang <https://github.com/coq-community/reglang>
I would like to compute concretely with a regular expression. Here is my attempt:
From mathcomp Require Import all_ssreflect.
From RegLang Require Import regexp.
Require Import List.
Import ListNotations.
Example simpl_accepts: [false; true] \in Conc (Atom false) (Atom true).
Proof.
compute. rewrite unlock.
compute. rewrite unlock.
compute.
replace (@idP true) with (ssrbool.ReflectT true is_true_true).
reflexivity.
(* need to show:
ReflectT true is_true_true = idP *)
Admitted.
If only we could show that the replacement is valid, then the proof goes through. But the term idP is opaque. So how does one go about computing with/reasoning about such terms in SSReflect?
Thank you Best wishes, ~n
- [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms, Nada Amin, 05/06/2021
- Re: [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms, Christian Doczkal, 05/06/2021
- Re: [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms, Nada Amin, 05/07/2021
- Re: [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms, Assia Mahboubi, 05/06/2021
- Re: [ssreflect] computing with fully ground and opaque terms, Christian Doczkal, 05/06/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.