Accéder au contenu.
Menu Sympa

starpu-devel - Re: [Starpu-devel] Reporting a bug

Objet : Developers list for StarPU

Archives de la liste

Re: [Starpu-devel] Reporting a bug


Chronologique Discussions 
  • From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
  • To: Leo Li <luli757@student.liu.se>
  • Cc: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Reporting a bug
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:36:49 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel>
  • List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Hello,

Leo Li, le Wed 15 Jun 2011 16:38:28 +0200, a écrit :
> When using
> performance model of history-based, it should add entries according to
> layout and size of parameters. This should be nothing to do with
> schedulors. However, when I change schedulor from dmda to random and
> run the same parameter layout and size, a new entry is added.

What do you mean by "a new entry"? If STARPU_CALIBRATE is set to 1,
task duration will be recorded regardless of the scheduler choice, yes.

Samuel





Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Haut de le page