Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
Re: [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda
Chronologique Discussions
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- To: Cyril Roelandt <cyril.roelandt@inria.fr>
- Cc: "starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr" <starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:34:28 +0900
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Cyril Roelandt, le Fri 20 Jul 2012 15:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
> This commit breaks tools/starpu_calibrate_bus.
> oops in initialize_cuda (core/perfmodel/perfmodel_bus.c:101)... 36:
> setting the device when a process is active is not allowed
Uh. I fail to see how that is possible, except a bug in libcuda. Anyway,
as you said starpu_calibrate_bus shouldn't call starpu_init.
> About the commit log: can we call starpu_worker_get_count() and
> _starpu_get_cuda_device_count() without calling starpu_init() first ?
Worker_get_count, no, and we don't use it in bus calibration.
get_cuda_device_count it fine (just like it was before the introduction
of starpu_init() in starpu_calibrate_bus).
Samuel
- [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda, Cyril Roelandt, 20/07/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda, Samuel Thibault, 20/07/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda, Samuel Thibault, 21/07/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Fwd: Re: [Starpu-commits] r6977 - in trunk: . src/core/perfmodel src/drivers/cuda, Samuel Thibault, 20/07/2012
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.