Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- To: Nathalie Furmento <nathalie.furmento@labri.fr>
- Cc: "starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr" <starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Schedulers
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:15:57 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Nathalie Furmento, le Thu 06 Dec 2012 11:41:11 +0100, a écrit :
> I would also suggest to rename pgreedy to peager or eager to greedy.
I'd rather rename pgreedy into peager, since it's the least used.
> We could also rename the dm* schedulers to a name based on heft (as
> heft is known in the litterature).
Well, actually our dmda is not yet a real heft, as it does not order
tasks by priority before scheduling them, only after. It could rather
be called mcs (minimum completion time), but as soon as we have a
scheduling window, we'll be able to do the ordering before scheduling.
So I'd say keeping heft as an alias for now. We'd have to discussion
with theoreticians, but I'm afraid there might not be really nicer
theoretical names to classify dm, dmda, dmdas, etc.
Samuel
- [Starpu-devel] Schedulers, Nathalie Furmento, 06/12/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Schedulers, Samuel Thibault, 10/12/2012
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.