Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- To: Jean-Marie Couteyen <jean-marie.couteyen@inria.fr>
- Cc: "starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr" <starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:40:34 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Hello,
Thanks!
Jean-Marie Couteyen, le Tue 25 Nov 2014 12:08:47 +0100, a écrit :
> I added the code for POTI too but did not test it. Anyway, is there any
> advantage to use POTI ?
One advantage is being quite sure of not producing syntaxically bogus
traces.
Samuel
- [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Jean-Marie Couteyen, 13/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Samuel Thibault, 13/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Jean-Marie Couteyen, 14/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Samuel Thibault, 17/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Jean-Marie Couteyen, 25/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Samuel Thibault, 26/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Jean-Marie Couteyen, 25/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Samuel Thibault, 17/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Jean-Marie Couteyen, 14/11/2014
- Re: [Starpu-devel] activity.data : nsubmitted, nready, Samuel Thibault, 13/11/2014
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.