Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
[Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf
Chronologique Discussions
- From: Philippe SWARTVAGHER <philippe.swartvagher@inria.fr>
- To: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:52:20 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Hello,
We just noticed that when running Chameleon, functions _starpu_mpi_backend_init are not called. That came from a wrong detection of starpu_mpi_init_conf, and starpu_mpi_init was called instead. I fixed it, proposed a PR, and I am waiting for merge.
Anyway, is it normal that starpu_mpi_init() doesn't make all the staff of starpu_mpi_init_conf(): backend initialization and core reservation ? Calling starpu_init() and then starpu_mpi_init() seems to be allowed by the doc, but starpu_mpi_init() should also initialize backend and eventually reserve core IMHO.
Is it a bug ?
--
Philippe SWARTVAGHER
Doctorant
Équipe TADaaM, Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest
- [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Samuel Thibault, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Samuel Thibault, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Incoherence between starpu_mpi_init and starpu_mpi_init_conf, Samuel Thibault, 12/02/2020
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.