Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
- From: Philippe SWARTVAGHER <philippe.swartvagher@inria.fr>
- To: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:01:43 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Le 12/02/2020 à 19:13, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hello,Your fix works well. Thank you !
Philippe SWARTVAGHER, le mer. 12 févr. 2020 09:50:24 +0100, a ecrit:
Ok, I found the issue and pushed a fix.I pushed to master an optimization (which was TODO for something like aI tested this morning on 4 miriel nodes, with Cholesky/Chameleon. I got the
decade) that avoids this part of the backtrace:
following backtrace, regardless of the communication layer:
--
Philippe SWARTVAGHER
Doctorant
Équipe TADaaM, Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 05/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 07/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 13/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 12/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 12/02/2020
- <Suite(s) possible(s)>
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 05/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 05/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 07/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Philippe SWARTVAGHER, 05/02/2020
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU overhead for MPI, Samuel Thibault, 07/02/2020
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.