Objet : Liste consacrée aux discussions à propos de la composition et de la typographie
Archives de la liste
- From: Robert Keeble <RKeeble AT Quark.Com>
- To: "'typographie AT irisa.fr'" <typographie AT irisa.fr>
- Subject: RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réfl exions"
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:37:39 -0600
O. Randier disait:
> In XPress, I usually set variable space to 25% in typographic
> preferences
> to get correct thin space (I use to type variable space instead of
> non-breaking thin space as suggested in the handbook, because
> the last one
> seems to be bugged). But I don't know what that 25% refers to
> : em-space,
> en-space, figure space? That's not clear (should be). I would be very
> interested to know exactly how XPress does its calculation about that,
> because it seems there are issues between electronic and lead
> type as to
> what really means an em-space.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You mean, is it measured off the actual 'm' character, or equal to the point
size?
Here's the rundown on all the QXP spaces:
standard space (word space) = the width of the space character in the font,
but is scaled by the 'optimum' setting in the H&Js diaog.
en-space = if standard em space is checked in preferences/character, it is
1/2 the point size, otherwise it is the width of the zero character.
flex space = scaled by user from the en-space character.
punct space = the width of the point ('.') character.
Rob Keeble
Quark, Inc.
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réfl exions", Robert Keeble, 29/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER, 29/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Thierry Bouche, 30/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER, 30/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Thierry Bouche, 30/09/1999
- <Suite(s) possible(s)>
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réfl exions", Robert Keeble, 29/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER, 29/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réfl exions", Robert Keeble, 30/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réfl exions", Robert Keeble, 30/09/1999
- RE: [XP] Re: More comments on "Réflexions", Olivier RANDIER, 29/09/1999
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.16.