Objet : Liste consacrée aux discussions à propos de la composition et de la typographie
Archives de la liste
- From: Lacroux <lacroux AT skynet.be>
- To: typographie AT irisa.fr
- Subject: Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:53:06 +0100
michcliq a écrit :
> vous avez dit bizarre ?
----
Non... car je crois que dans les grands corps la progression s'explique tout
bêtement par « douze », ce qui n'a rien d'étrange...
Cicero
-----------------------------------------------------------
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, (suite)
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Jean-Denis Rondinet, 07/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Jacques Andre, 10/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Michel Bovani, 07/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Philippe Jallon, 07/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Jacques Andre, 10/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, DP, 07/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Joshua, 09/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Patrick Orvane, 09/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Joshua, 09/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, DP, 10/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, michcliq, 11/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Lacroux, 11/01/2000
- Re: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, Jean-Denis Rondinet, 07/01/2000
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.16.