Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cado-nfs - Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Curious non-monotonicity

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Curious non-monotonicity


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Zimmermann Paul <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
  • To: paul.leyland@gmail.com
  • Cc: Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Curious non-monotonicity
  • Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:38:28 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss>
  • List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Paul,

> From: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:27:39 +0000
>
> Running "grep tasks.sieve.rels_wanted pa*" in params_py yields curious
> output. Spotted this because I've started a c130 immediately after a
> successful c131. The relevant lines from that grep are:
>
> params.c130:tasks.sieve.rels_wanted = 29000000
> params.c131:tasks.sieve.rels_wanted = 20000000
>
>
> FWIW, the c131 needed a little over 24M relations.
>
> I'm guessing that, for instance,
>
> params.c132:tasks.sieve.rels_wanted = 1
>
> indicates that no experimental data is yet available. As time goes by I
> may be able to provide such data.
>
>
> Paul

you might use rels_wanted=1 always, then after each unsuccessful filtering
CADO-NFS will try with 10% more relations.

Paul Z.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page