Discussion related to cado-nfs

[Pierrick Gaudry <pierrick.gaudry@loria.fr>]

Can you try again with commit 439f889f22f06a5777c ?

Pierrick

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Pierrick Gaudry wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> That's actually a tough one! The problem seems to come from the algebraic
> polynomial selected by cado on this input: it triggers problems if forced
> to be used on other inputs (of various sizes).
> 
> We are working on it, but have no clue yet about what is going on.
> So I can't guess when this will be solved. I'll file a bug in the
> tracker.
> 
> Thanks a lot for reporting!
> 
> Pierrick
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:36:28PM +0200, Pierrick Gaudry wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I could reproduce the bug here.
> > I'll have a look tomorrow afternoon (Nancy's time).
> > 
> > P.
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:33:37PM +0300, Христофор Бобров wrote:
> > > The problem is that for 4 other numbers 50 decimal digits CADO works 
> > > fine, but for this there is no.
> > > 
> > > 06.04.2017, 23:25, "paul zimmermann" <paul.zimmermann@inria.fr>:
> > > >>  Oh, I'm sorry. Forgot to say I used the p60 parameters for this 
> > > >> number.
> > > >
> > > > maybe those parameters are not adapted for a p50. Can you reproduce 
> > > > the
> > > > issue with a p60?
> > > >
> > > > Paul Zimmermann
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Best regards
> > > Бобров Х.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
> > > Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > > https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
> Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss