Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cado-nfs - Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] caused by a larger special-q

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] caused by a larger special-q


Chronological Thread 
  • From: canny georgina <cannysiska@gmail.com>
  • To: Pierrick Gaudry <pierrick.gaudry@loria.fr>
  • Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] caused by a larger special-q
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:13:45 +0700
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=cannysiska@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=cannysiska@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-ua0-f174.google.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
  • List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Have tried tasks.sieve.allow_largesq = true, thank you for the suggestion, i think this one is more flexible than enlarging lpb0 and lpb1 (because i can't monitor the computation 24/7).
But, I do change the largesq option by interrupting the computation first (using Ctrl+C) then re-input the snapshot using tasks.sieve.allow_largesq = true option. Will it take any effect then?

However, I'm curious whether it's possible to resume the computation of a failed workunit. I mean, this "not-enabled-allow-largesq" option has made the computation stop in the middle (because of so many failed workunits) and when I tried to resume its snapshot using same trick (by adding tasks.sieve.allow_largesq = true option) , it failed to resume.



2018-07-23 21:57 GMT+07:00 Pierrick Gaudry <pierrick.gaudry@loria.fr>:
> well, I run it as a root because I need to install some dependencies first
> before using cado, so it feels kinda bothersome to reenter password
> everytime It needs root permission. But, will it be unsafe, then?

It depends if you trust the cado-nfs developpers ;-)

Even if we are honest, we could have made a mistake in the code that
implies doing "rm -rf /" or something similarly bad for the system, if
you gives weird, untested parameters.

At your own risk...

Regards,
Pierrick




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page