Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cado-nfs - Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Newer Commit Takes Longer to filter (Ed Hall)

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Newer Commit Takes Longer to filter (Ed Hall)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
  • To: Ed Hall <ed_ka2fwj@yahoo.com>
  • Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Newer Commit Takes Longer to filter (Ed Hall)
  • Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:31:50 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
  • List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Ed,

> I did revert all my farm to the May commit for the recent tests. Let me
> know
> if you still want me to revert them to an earlier commit and whether I
> should
> revert the entire farm, or go with the original mix and match farm that
> produced the shorter times for the earlier c130. OR, if you would rather I
> run something in the c15x region on the already set up May commit, I could
> easily do that.

as I said earlier, what would be most useful at this point would be to have
the same tarball for the c130, but for the 2019 commit you used.

(Comparing with a different number will make it more difficult to isolate the
issue.)

Paul




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page