Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cado-nfs - Re: [cado-nfs] Excessive lingen Time for Processing

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [cado-nfs] Excessive lingen Time for Processing


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
  • To: Ed Hall <ed_ka2fwj@yahoo.com>
  • Cc: Emmanuel.Thome@inria.fr, cado-nfs@inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [cado-nfs] Excessive lingen Time for Processing
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:57:53 +0200
  • Authentication-results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@tomate

Ed,

please can you try your longer run (with msieve) after setting
OMP_DYNAMIC=true as follows?

$ export OMP_DYNAMIC=true

Best regards,
Paul

> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:17:06 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Ed Hall <ed_ka2fwj@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "cado-nfs@inria.fr" <cado-nfs@inria.fr>
>
>
> [1:text/plain Show]
>
>
> [2:text/html Hide Save:noname (4kB)]
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> I'm still slightly confused with the suggestion.
>
> According to grep:
>
> $ grep -r "OMP_DYNAMIC" *
> ci/03-check.sh:export OMP_DYNAMIC=true STATS_PARSING_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL=1
> gf2x/ci/03-check.sh:export OMP_DYNAMIC=true STATS_PARSING_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL=1
> tests/CMakeLists.txt:# cautious. Setting OMP_DYNAMIC=true seems to alleviate
> this problem
>
> It looks as though OMP_DYNAMIC is already set to true. But, the CADO-NFS
> package is too complicated for my amateur level of programming knowledge.
> Should I be inserting "OMP_DYNAMIC=true" into a command during the build or
> running of CADO-NFS?
>
> Thanks for all the help
>
> Sincerely,
> Edwin Hall



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page