cado-nfs - Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin.

Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs

List archive

Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin.

From: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
To: eric.jeancolas@free.fr
Cc: cado-nfs@inria.fr, paul.leyland@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin.
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 09:33:38 +0200
Authentication-results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@coriandre

Hi Eric,

> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:13:31 +0200 (CEST)
> From: eric.jeancolas@free.fr
>
> Hi Paul(s)
>
> Just a question of logic.
> Issuing a grep tasks.I params* on parameters/factor, I get the following
> params.c105:tasks.I = 12
> params.c110:tasks.I = 12
> params.c115:tasks.I = 12
> params.c120:tasks.I = 12
> params.c125:tasks.I = 13
> params.c130:tasks.I = 14
> params.c135:tasks.I = 13
> params.c140:tasks.I = 13
> params.c145:tasks.I = 13
> params.c150:tasks.I = 13
> params.c155:tasks.I = 14
> params.c160:tasks.I = 14
> params.c165:tasks.I = 14
> params.c170:tasks.I = 14
> params.c175:tasks.I = 14
>
> Well, about params.c130, it seems have a continuity check. Shouldn't be set
> to 13 ?

these parameters were set using some optimization tool.
This tool does not guarantee continuity of the parameters.
If you change tasks.I to 13 in params.c130, beware that
you have to adapt the other parameters, otherwise you might
have a suboptimal configuration.

Best regards,
Paul

Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin., Paul Zimmermann, 07/04/2023
- Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin., eric . jeancolas, 07/05/2023
  - Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin., Paul Zimmermann, 07/06/2023

List archive

Re: [cado-nfs] Parameter documentatin.